Biography & Net Worth: House votes to insult Trump’s former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows in a January 6 investigation

WASHINGTON – The House of Representatives on Tuesday pledged to insult Congress after former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows stopped working with a January 6 committee investigating parliamentary riots. A member that has been despised since the 1830s.

The 222-208 party line vote is the second time the special committee has called for punishment for witnesses opposing the summons. The vote is the latest military display of force by the panel on January 6, which has investigated the worst attacks on the Capitol in more than 200 years, so there is no unexplained angle and the summons remains unanswered. .. Panel members are determined to elicit a swift response, in which they reclaim authority over former President Donald Trump’s parliament destroyed during his tenure.

“History will be written about this time, about the work done by this committee,” said Chairman Benny Thompson, R-Miss. said. “And history does not consider you a martyr. History doesn’t consider you a victim.”

Congressman Jamie Ruskin, another member of the panel, began debating Tuesday’s motion, reading desperate texts from the day of the attack, from Congressmen, Fox News anchors and even Trump’s son. The president, who urged Meadows to persuade him to leave the country, would act swiftly to prevent a three-hour attack by his supporters.

A House vote sent the case to a US law firm in Washington, where it was up to the prosecutor to decide whether to file the case with a grand jury, which could be criminally charged. I will be entrusted with this.

If convicted, Bannon and Meadows could face delays of up to a year on each claim.

A nine-member panel voted 9-0 on Monday night recommending the prosecution of a former North Carolina congressman who left to become Trump’s chief of staff in March 2020.

Republicans on Tuesday called the action against Meadows a distraction from the work of the House, and one member called it “evil” and “un-American.”

Ohio Representative Jim Jordan asked Meadows to praise. “Undoubtedly, when Democrats vote in favor of this proposal, it is a vote to put the good guys in jail.”

“I think Mark should be doing the right thing. He’s a good guy. He shouldn’t be over it,” Trump said in an interview defending Meadows.

And Meadows’ attorney George Turwilliger defended the client in a pre-voting statement, pointing out that he had provided the document to the panel and argued that he should not be forced to appear in the interview.

“The selection committee’s true intention in dealing with Mr Meadows became clear when they accused him of despising a document he had produced with his cooperation,” Tarwilliger said.

Meadows himself sued the panel and asked the court to invalidate the two subpoenas that he said were “too broad and overly burdensome.”

Meanwhile, Republican Senator Mitch McConnell told reporters, “I think we’re all watching what’s going on in the House of Representatives, you and everyone involved. It will be interesting to identify the participants.”

He said he had not been in contact with Meadows on the day of the attack.

The Democratic Party has long cited the January 6 text message while Meadows was cooperating with the commission.

“I want the Oval Office address,” said Donald Trump Jr., as his father’s supporters broke into the Capitol, sent lawmakers hard-pressed, and blocked Joe Biden’s evidence of the presidential victory. it was sent. “He has to lead now. It’s gone too far and is out of control.”

“They should blame it as soon as possible,” Trump Jr. said. In response to one of Trump Jr.’s texts, Meadows said, “I’m taking it hard. I agree.”

Committee members said the text would raise new questions about what was happening in the White House and what Trump himself was doing while the attack was underway. The commission plans to ask Meadows about 6,600 pages of recorded communications and about 2,000 text messages taken from personal email accounts. The panel has not released the communication in full.

At the commission’s Monday night meeting, Wyoming Republican Liz Cheney said a key issue raised by the text was Trump’s refusal to send a powerful message to deter the crowd. Said if he tried to interfere with his certification.

“These texts are undeniable,” Cheney said. “The White House knew exactly what was happening in the Capitol.”

The commission of inquiry has already interviewed over 300 witnesses and summoned over 40 as it seeks to create the most comprehensive record of riots and violent sieges ever recorded. Did.

If Meadows appears to be taking his testimony, lawmakers will ask him about Trump’s efforts, including working with the state and communicating with lawmakers, weeks before the election before the riots. Did.

The panel wants to know more about whether Trump was involved in a debate over the National Guard’s response, which was delayed for hours by escalating violence and beating up police guarding the Capitol building.

The panel said the document provided by Meadows included an email sent to an unidentified person stating that “security guards will be on hand to protect the people of Protramp.” The commission did not release additional details regarding the email.

Commission staff have rejected those claims by election officials and courts across the country.

Copyright © 2021 AP Communications. All rights reserved.

House votes to insult Trump’s former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in January 6 probe

Source link: House votes on January 6 probe to insult Trump’s former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows